Election Integrity is not about the 'Right' or 'Left'...it's about RIGHT and WRONG!


| HOME | Contact | Donate | FREE MOVIE | Calendar of Events| Steal Your Election| Brad Blog | Diebold Watch |

Thursday, August 28, 2008

Ed R. Murrow a.k.a. Real Journalism is Dead


The Fourth Estate is actively at work.

The corporate media has done a miserable job over the past decades representing the people they are supposed to work for--the citizens. Instead, they serve the corporate business and wealth interests in our country. It is nearly impossible to get accurate and investigative journalism anymore. Instead, what you get is propaganda for and by the oppressors and mudslinging against anyone who is fighting to keep the constitution in tact and to represent and fight for democracy.

Whenever we link to and quote corporate media sources, let this be a general disclaimer that for any one nugget of truth and transparency they report, they suppress, propagandize and/or outright shill for their corporate bosses ten times more often. Since we are an all-volunteer citizen organization and not a conglomerate, corporate-moneyed "news" organization, we don't have to serve anyone but the American citizens. So, as we link and quote to 'news' articles in this post and past and future ones, keep in mind we are extremely dissatisfied with the overall tone and coverage of this fight, save for one or two reporters who at least attempted to get a general understanding of the issues and report as such.

Unfortunately, the editors and owners call the final shots and determine what gets printed. So-called journalists who have no problem calling people insane or knotheads or idiots. We would like to ask Nintzel and Boegle what 'evidence' they have that Kromko is insane or that state Rep. Russell Pearce is a knothead and Don Goldwater is an 'idiot'? It seems anyone that goes after corporate abuse gets called names and presented as liars. You don’t have to agree with someone’s positions but this is beyond unprofessional and an indication of just what the standards are at the Weekly. You would think for all the fake concern the Tucson Weekly has published in prior articles regarding the welfare of immigrants on the border, that they would at least want to look at the main cause of the ongoing border issues...the illegal corporate abusers. One thing seems consistent, from their ongoing reporting to endorsements, the corporate candidates and corporate initiatives are backed by the Weekly the vast majority of the time over taxpayer and citizen rights.

In the Jimmys’ world, when the RTA sponsors pay a along time corporate hack pollster to propagandize that the initiative would have passed anyway, and the hack is said to have been so "nice" to supply that propaganda--and of course being the independent, responsible journalists Jimmy and Jim Nintzel are, they don't question the conflict of interest on the purported polls. Nope. And Boegle doesn't need 'evidence' that the polls were done when said, that the results are what they show, etc. Why does he have a vested interest in denying the election was stolen? That is the real question. Oh, but with plenty of circumstantial evidence and a signed affidavit saying it WAS stolen, well that isn't evidence to him and instead, his paper accuses the person swearing by the affidavit of being a criminal type element, bad employee, etc. Even more ironic, the polls they quote didn't even show the initiative passing! It shows 46% the week up to the election. You need 50%+ to pass. Apparently they need reading glasses too. I guess the real life polls by people who actually talked to voters in thousands going door-to-door don't matter to the Tucson Weekly because it doesn't serve their agenda.

Those numbers aren't "evidence" in the Nintzel/Boegle Orwellian world.

Labels: , , , , ,


Bookmark and Share
---------------oOo---------------

Saturday, August 16, 2008

"If I Did It: Confessions of the Hacker and How I rigged a $2 Billion RTA Election":


Who is willing to take a polygraph?

Short report: What we believe happened in the May 16, 2006, Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) bond election in Pima County, Arizona

Video clip on how we believe it was done and the equipment used then see this short video. From HBO’s Hacking Democracy: The Pima county way and the special equipment needed to Rig the RTA Pima Election Department purchased a Cropscanner Card Reader programmer

Confession is good for the soul.

A press report last week quoted Bryan Crane as saying he had to look up on a map where the Boondocks Bar was located. However he got there, he was seen that evening by another available witness who knows Mr. Crane. Mr. Osmolski related his conversation with Mr. Crane to four separate people at the bar that evening.

After watching these two short video clips you can understand what guilt does and why Bryan Crane confessed to Zbgniew Osmolski:

Video clip Attorney Bill Risner deposing 'the hacker' Bryan Crane 2/27/07. A very nervous, guilt ridden Pima county election Diebold/GEMS computer operator.

Video clip from the Pima County AZ court trial testimony of Bryan Crane. Bill Risner on redirect takes Crane apart over the slip of the finger on the computer mouse, bull manure story.

-John Brakey

Labels: , , , , , , ,


Bookmark and Share
---------------oOo---------------

Friday, August 15, 2008

Tucson Citizen & Tucson Weekly still get it wrong


AuditAZ Co-Founder and election integrity activist, John Brakey, sent a letter to activists regarding the Tucson Citizen and Tucson Weekly's misconstruing the facts of the Pima Democratic Party's lawsuit against the Board of Supervisors for the election databases.

Below is part of the letter regarding the legal decision and background:

"In its endorsement of Sharon Bronson, the Tucson Citizen misconstrued the facts. Therefore, misled its readers when it did not provide context for the Board’s expensive yearlong opposition to releasing electronic computer databases.

The Tucson Weekly followed with its own endorsement of Bronson without providing context. The judge ruled that electronic databases were public records because the county was unable to prove its burden that releasing the records was a security risk. Indeed, it is true as Donna Branch-Gilby affirmed, that Bronson made a motion on January 8, 2008 not to appeal the Judge’s first order to release only two databases.

However, the larger context of all of the motions made at the January 8 meeting clearly proves that Bronson’s maneuver was intended to block the release of all other databases, including the RTA, that the Democratic party had asked for. The judge’s order allowed for future release of more databases beyond the two.

Bronson’s claim that that she made the motion not to appeal does not tell the story that she was the one who cited “legal impediments” to obstruct the release of the databases.

The Fact is the Board of Supervisors is also the Board of Elections. The key to honest elections lies here in Pima County with them, not with the appointed County Manager who has known since 1996 about the Diebold election system backdoor.

Here is a video link to what really happened at the Jan 8th BOS meeting (20 minutes). It is not like what Bronson has said.

http://www.sweetremedy.tv/pages/forcedagenda.html

The Clip comes from an upcoming Documentary Called "Forced Agenda: How the Growth Industry Subverts Democracy"

Bronson and Valadez, for over two years, fought us over the issues of transparency in elections and never voted with us until “yuppie riot”.

On Jan 8th, I knew the only way we could win was to get Supervisor Ann Day (R) with us by putting Richard Elias (D) on the spot. Richard never voted with us unless we lost. I knew this, and got people to contact Ann Day.

What put us over the top with Ann Day was Dr Tom Ryan meeting with her, and was able to finally convince her.

Bronson on the morning of the 8th called me and tried to play me by saying to me "you won, let’s work together again.” Then at the meeting, Bronson tries to release just the two databases the judge initially ordered, which would have been useless for the purposes of analysis. To find a flip you have to have a flop. You can't do one with out the other.

If anyone should get credit for pushing the Jan 8th vote over the top it was Ann Day. The video link shows the clear position of Bronson and her obstruction to transparency.

Half way through the video, please pay special attention to Huckleberry and Deputy County Attorney Straub celebrate when they thought they had successfully fooled the crowd into accepting one database for the Primary, and one for the General Election of 2006.

However, their little celebration was premature. At the break Richard Elias tried to clear the room, before the rest of the speakers had been heard from. As the meeting starts again the "yuppie revolt" erupted to help clinch the victory. We won the vote to release all the databases by 5 to 0, including the RTA databases, thanks to Ann Day (just like I said would happen if we had her vote).

We have the rest of the video from J.T. with Sound and Fury, that we could mine for more details.

So friends, what do we do? Change Can’t Wait.

Hope, Peace and Democracy.

John

John Brakey, co-founder of AUDIT-AZ (Americans United for Democracy, Integrity, and Transparency in Elections, Arizona) & Co-Coordinator Investigations for Election Defense Alliance. "

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,


Bookmark and Share
---------------oOo---------------